|
|
|
Home
/
Departments
/ Program Evaluation
/ Evaluation Process
|
|
| |
The
Evaluation Process in Chesapeake |
|
|
 |
|
Review
of the Literature
Once a program is targeted for evaluation, a thorough
search of educational literature is conducted to identify
best practices in similar programs.
Preparation of the Evaluation Proposal
Prior to an evaluation, an evaluation proposal is prepared
outlining the parameters of the study including benchmarks
for measuring success. All team members agree to the
written proposal before evaluation begins.
Evaluation Methodology:
- Compile Program Information.
The evaluation team obtains background information,
including documents containing goals and objectives,
procedures, and processes of the program, as well as
organizational charts and job descriptions. Questions
are posed to staff members to elicit their
perspectives on the program, including its purpose,
"customers," history, and the allocation of
resources. Individuals are asked about their
responsibilities and the steps involved in performing
essential tasks. Individuals also are asked about
internal and external working relationships, about
problems and challenges they face, about specific
issues or concerns, and about any recent changes or
improvements in the program. Individuals are invited
to share written information such as procedures and
forms.
- State Research Questions and Research Objectives.
The evaluation team uses program information to
formulate research questions. Research objectives are
developed based on the research questions.
- Identify Performance Indicators.
The evaluation team identifies and agrees on
indicators of success in a program. These performance
indicators are evaluated against established criteria
for effectiveness. The evaluation team reviews the
literature to discover and analyze "best
practices" of related programs and to identify
standards typically applied to similar programs.
Information from the review of the literature is used
to identify potential areas for improvement through
the application of new methods and standards.
- Design Methods of Data Collection.
The evaluation team uses the performance criteria
established as measurements of success to guide the
collection of data. Data collected is used to answer
the research questions. In all cases, questions relate
to the effectiveness, efficiency, and economy of the
program, focusing on deliverers and receivers of
services.
- Report of Findings and Recommendations. Upon
completion of the evaluation, the team documents
findings related to the effectiveness, efficiency, and
economy of the program. Findings report the degree of
correspondence between actual performance and criteria
for measuring success, including the following:
- What conditions exist in contrast to the
performance criteria being used
- Causes of the conditions
- Effects of the conditions on the program
The evaluation team makes recommendations,
balancing the interests and concerns of parents and
students, staff members, and the community/taxpayers.
An extensive report of findings and recommendations is
prepared for the Superintendent’s staff and the
School Board. Once the report is shared with the
School Board, administrators in the school division
receive a copy of the evaluation.
|
|
|
Copyright ©
2002 Chesapeake Public Schools
All Rights Reserved
|
|
|
|
 |